Waskul v. Washtenaw County Community Mental Health
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
569 F. Supp. 3d 626 (2021)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Four severely developmentally disabled adults, including Derek Waskul, together with the Washtenaw Association for Community Advocacy (collectively, Waskul) (plaintiffs) sued Washtenaw County Community Mental Health (WCCMH) (defendant), alleging that its modified budgeting methodology deprived Waskul and similarly situated individuals of medically necessary community living support services, in violation of federal and state law. During discovery, Waskul served several requests for production (RFPs), including RFP 39 seeking documents about budgeting and reimbursement of community living support services from several custodians. The parties agreed on certain search terms, and Waskul asked WCCMH to run five test searches on its email network. Only one test produced results within the expected range. Waskul proposed including the successful terms in RFP 39 and requested that WCCMH produce 80 randomly selected emails—20 from each failed test—to confirm search accuracy and identify missing materials. WCCMH refused to produce the test emails, test other search terms, or set a production deadline, citing staffing shortages, budget limits, and its reliance on a single employee with access to the email system. Waskul countered that WCCMH had a $9 million annual budget, used the county’s email system, and had access to cost-effective e-discovery tools. Waskul also contended that WCCMH’s counsel lacked e-discovery competence, citing counsel’s failure to interview custodians, improper reliance on Waskul to design search protocols, and objections to the term “custodian.”
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stafford, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

