United States v. Moore

521 F.3d 681 (2008)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
521 F.3d 681 (2008)

SC

Facts

Michael Sanders was arrested after landing at an airport with a suitcase of heroin. Sanders agreed to cooperate with law enforcement and brought the suitcase, as planned, to the car of Taofiq Afonja (defendant). Afonja was arrested but claimed that he did not know what was in the suitcase. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called police officer Robert Coleman as an expert witness. Coleman testified over Afonja’s objection that based on his experience with drug deals, only people who had knowledge of a drug deal would be present at such a deal. Coleman did not provide any facts, data, principles, or methods to support his opinion. Afonja objected on the sole ground that Coleman had never experienced a drug deal like the one in this case. The trial court held that Coleman was an expert on drug deals, which covered the drug deal in this case. Afonja was convicted, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership