United States v. Borowy
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
595 F.3d 1045 (2010)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
LimeWire was a publicly available peer-to-peer file-sharing computer program. A particular version of LimeWire allowed a user to enable a feature that prevented others from downloading or viewing the names of files on the user’s computer. A federal agent logged onto LimeWire to monitor trafficking in child pornography. Using a forensic software program that displayed a red flag next to known pornography images, the agent conducted a keyword search in LimeWire and identified a file containing a child-pornography image shared through an IP address later determined to belong to Charles Borowy (defendant). The agent viewed the names of all 240 files being shared from Borowy’s IP address and downloaded and viewed seven files, four of which contained child pornography. The LimeWire feature that would allow Borowy to prevent others from downloading his files was not enabled when the agent downloaded the files from Borowy’s computer. Borowy’s laptop, CDs, and floppy disks were seized pursuant to a search warrant, and more than 600 images of child pornography were found. Borowy was charged with possession of child pornography. Borowy’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained from his laptop and disks was denied. Borowy entered a conditional plea of guilty and argued on appeal that the agent’s conduct in locating and downloading the files from LimeWire constituted a warrantless search and seizure in violation of Borowy's Fourth Amendment rights. Borowy maintained that because he intended to turn on the feature that would make his files private, he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the files. Borowy also argued that the agent’s use of a forensic software program that was unavailable to the public made the search of his files unlawful.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

