Toscano v. Greene Music

21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 732 (2004)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Toscano v. Greene Music

California Court of Appeal
21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 732 (2004)

Facts

Joseph Toscano (plaintiff), an at-will employee, worked as general manager of Fields Pianos (Fields). In July 2001, Greene Music (defendant) offered Toscano a job with a start date of September 1, 2001. Toscano accepted the job and resigned from Fields Piano on August 1, 2002. Two weeks later, Greene withdrew its offer. Toscano searched for employment and eventually accepted a lower-paying job. Toscano subsequently sued Greene, claiming promissory estoppel. At a bench trial, Toscano argued that he was entitled to expectancy damages in the form of the lost wages Fields would have paid him from September 1, 2001 through his expected retirement in 2017. In support of his claim, Toscano presented expert testimony that his lost wages for this time period totaled $417,772. Toscano’s expert based this calculation on the assumption that Toscano would have remained at his job with Fields if Greene had not offered him a job. The trial court, reasoning that Toscano had moved to higher-paying employers in the past and would likely have continued to do so, awarded him $536,833. Greene filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. Greene appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Rourke, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership