Sturdevant v. Paulsen
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
218 F.3d 1160 (2000)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Katherine Sturdevant (plaintiff) was a full-time history instructor at a Colorado community college. She was terminated from her position and filed a wrongful-termination claim in federal court against the Colorado State Board for Community Colleges and Occupational Education (the board) (defendant). The board’s purpose was to develop and establish state policy for occupational education in the state’s community colleges. Thus, it operated with the same powers and duties as boards of higher-education institutions. In addition, the governor appointed 11 of the 13 members of the board. The board asserted state immunity from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court denied immunity to the board, finding that it was a political subdivision rather than an arm of the state or alter ego. The board filed an interlocutory appeal, arguing that it was an alter ego of the state and was thus an arm of the state for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lucero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

