State v. Gaona

270 P.3d 1165 (2012)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Gaona

Kansas Supreme Court
270 P.3d 1165 (2012)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

A jury convicted Rodolfo Gaona (defendant) of multiple counts of rape and aggravated sodomy of his stepdaughter, M. L. Sexual-assault nurse examiner (SANE) Nikki Wiecken testified that she physically examined M. L. at the hospital and interviewed M. L. using a forensic-interview technique called the Finding Words method, a semi-structured interview technique that allowed children to use their own words. Ganoa presented Robert Barnett, a clinical psychologist, as an expert witness to testify about general issues with the Finding Words method and particular issues with Wiecken’s interview of M. L. The prosecution (plaintiff) also called Kelly Robbins as an expert witness. Robbins’s testimony was not specific to M. L.’s interviews or allegations. At the time of Gaona’s trial, Robbins was the executive director of both the Western Kansas Child Advocacy Center and Finding Words of Kansas, and Robbins had personally interviewed at least 150 children. Robbins was not a licensed mental-health professional and had no formal training in psychology, psychiatry, social work, or child development. Robbins described herself as a “fact-finder” rather than a mental health professional. Robbins testified that she had received training in the Finding Words protocol, had taught parts of the Finding Words course, and was certified to conduct forensic interviews using the protocol by the American Prosecutors Research Institute. Robbins testified that secrecy around child abuse often leads to delayed or partial disclosure, that it is more difficult for children to report abuse if it occurred at home or was committed by a family member, and that it is probably rare for children to fabricate sexual-abuse allegations and doing so would take significant effort and time. Gaona appealed, arguing in relevant part that Robbins was unqualified to testify as an expert witness to common behavior of child victims of sexual abuse. The appellate court rejected Gaona’s argument that Robbins was unqualified, but it reversed one of Gaona’s rape convictions on other grounds. Gaona appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beier, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership