State v. Finkle

319 A.2d 733 (1974)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Finkle

New Jersey Superior Court
319 A.2d 733 (1974)

SC

Facts

Harold Finkle (defendant) was charged with going 75.3 miles per hour in a 55 miles-per-hour zone. A police officer clocked Finkle’s speed with a visual average-speed computer and recorder (VASCAR). A VASCAR measured a car’s speed by measuring the time it took the car to get from point A to point B, which the police officer marked ahead of time. The VASCAR then calculated the speed in miles per hour using a computerized calculator. The police officer who clocked Finkle’s speed was trained in calibrating and using the VASCAR. At trial, the judge took judicial notice of the scientific reliability of the VASCAR. To do so, the judge relied on a series of evaluations and reports that stated that the VASCAR was a reliable tool for measuring speed, with only a small margin of error. Finkle was convicted, and he appealed, arguing that expert testimony was necessary on the issue of the VASCAR’s scientific reliability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Conford, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership