Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 13 (1964)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Simpson (plaintiff) entered into a lease agreement with Union Oil Co. of California (Union Oil). Simpson and Union Oil also entered into a consignment agreement. Simpson claimed that Union Oil required companies that leased Union Oil’s retail outlets also enter into consignment agreements, and Simpson did so. Under the terms of the consignment agreement, Simpson would sell gasoline consigned to it by Union Oil at prices fixed by Union Oil and receive payment by commission for the gasoline sold. Union Oil retained title to the gasoline consigned to Simpson’s possession and paid property tax on it until it was sold. Simpson was liable for all losses of the gasoline in his possession and paid the costs of operation. The consignment agreement would be terminated upon termination of the lease. While a consignee of Union Oil, Simpson sold gasoline for 27.9 cents per gallon, below the price of 29.9 cents per gallon fixed by Union Oil. Union Oil therefore refused to renew Simpson’s lease, and the consignment agreement was terminated. Simpson sued Union Oil, alleging that the intertwining of the consignment agreement and the lease allowed Union Oil to enforce its fixed price by conditioning renewal of the lease on compliance with the price it set, in violation of the Sherman Act. The district court ruled that Simpson had failed to establish a violation of the Sherman Act, and the court of appeals upheld. The United States Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to hear the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

