Shih v. Starbucks Corporation

267 Cal. Rptr. 3d 919 (2020)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Shih v. Starbucks Corporation

California Court of Appeal
267 Cal. Rptr. 3d 919 (2020)

Facts

Tina Shih (plaintiff) purchased two cups of hot tea from a Starbucks store. Each tea was served with a lid and was double-cupped, meaning one cup was placed inside another, but neither had a cardboard sleeve. Shih carried both drinks, one in each hand, to a table, noticing that they were extremely hot. After setting the drinks down, she sat and removed the lid from her cup. While seated, Shih attempted to bend forward and take a sip from the open cup in front of her. To accomplish this, Shih tried to push her chair back slightly, but the chair slid farther than she anticipated. To steady herself, Shih grabbed the table, knocking over the cup and spilling the tea onto her thighs, causing second-degree burns. Shih sued Starbucks Corporation (defendant) for products liability and negligence, alleging that the cup was defective, too hot, and too full and that it lacked a sleeve. The trial court granted Starbucks’s motion for summary judgment, finding that any alleged defect or negligence did not proximately cause Shih’s injuries. Shih appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Segal, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership