Second Measure, Inc. v. Kim

143 F. Supp. 3d 961 (2015)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Second Measure, Inc. v. Kim

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
143 F. Supp. 3d 961 (2015)

Facts

Second Measure, Incorporated, along with its corporate founders, Michael Babineau and Lillian Chou (plaintiffs), brought an action against Steven Kim (defendant), seeking a declaration that Kim held no equity interest in Second Measure. Kim counterclaimed, alleging that he and Babineau had formed a partnership to develop a business focused on analyzing credit-card-spending data. According to Kim, the two orally agreed to share equally in ownership, profits, and management, and subsequently worked together for several months. Kim asserted that Chou later joined the venture and conspired with Babineau to exclude Kim from the partnership. Kim further claimed that in September 2014, Babineau and Chou shut him out of the business by blocking his access to their servers, their applications, and his prior work product. Babineau and Kim then incorporated the venture as Second Measure and carried on in the same line of business. Second Measure denied the existence of any partnership agreement and contended that if any partnership were created, it was dissolved in September 2014. Second Measure moved to dismiss Kim’s claims, arguing that after the partnership was dissolved, Babineau was released of any fiduciary duties, including the duty not to compete, and was therefore free to continue operating in the same line of business.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Spero, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership