Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S

Schillinger v. United States

155 U.S. 163 (1894)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Schillinger v. United States

United States Supreme Court
155 U.S. 163 (1894)

Facts

John Schillinger (plaintiff) obtained a patent for a concrete improvement. The federal government (defendant) contracted with a company (defendant) to install pavement on the United States Capitol grounds. This contract did not mention Schillinger’s patent. Schillinger sued the federal government and the installation company in the United States Court of Claims, alleging that the company had wrongfully used Schillinger’s patented improvement on the Capitol project. The Court of Claims ruled that Schillinger’s claim was solely a tort claim with no contractual component and that the federal government was immune from being sued for tort claims. Accordingly, the Court of Claims dismissed Schillinger’s claims against the federal government. Schillinger appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brewer, J.)

Dissent (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Key Terms