Sagtikos Manor Historical Society, Inc. v. Robert David Lion Gardiner Foundation, Inc.
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
9 N.Y.S.3d 80 (2015)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Robert Gardiner owned Sagtikos Manor, a 10-acre property with a historic manor house. In 1964, Gardiner allowed the Sagtikos Manor Historical Society (society) (plaintiff) to begin giving tours of the house and maintain the property. In 1985, Gardiner conveyed the manor to a newly created charitable trust known as the Robert David Lion Gardiner Foundation (foundation) (defendant). The foundation’s charter documents stated that the trust’s purpose included educating the public about the area’s history and sponsoring existing and future historical societies sharing the area’s traditions and heritage. In 2002, the foundation sold the manor to Suffolk County. The society then entered an agreement with the county to maintain and preserve the manor. When Gardiner died in 2004, his will stated that his residuary estate was to be held in trust for his widow, Eunice Gardiner, for life and then be distributed to the foundation. When Eunice died in 2011, the trust contained approximately $81 million. The society contacted the foundation, seeking an accounting of the charitable remainder of Gardiner’s estate. The foundation refused to give an accounting on the basis that the society was not a named beneficiary under any will or trust. The society then sued the foundation, seeking a declaration regarding Gardiner’s intent for the foundation and its charitable purposes and beneficiaries. The foundation moved to dismiss the suit. The trial court rejected the motion to dismiss, and the foundation appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Skelos, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

