Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Association
United States Supreme Court
128 S. Ct. 989 (2008)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Congress passed a law prohibiting states from enacting or enforcing any law relating to prices, routes, or services of motor carriers carrying property for delivery. Maine passed a law prohibiting any person from accepting an order for tobacco delivery unless the person was licensed by the state to be a tobacco dealer. The law also provided that when ordering tobacco for delivery, licensed retailers must use a delivery service that used a recipient-verification service to ensure that the recipient was legally old enough to buy tobacco. Finally, the law prohibited anyone from delivering tobacco to anyone without a tobacco license. Under the law, motor carriers were deemed to know that a shipment contained tobacco if it had certain markings of a tobacco company. The New Hampshire Motor Transport Association (plaintiff) sued the State of Maine (defendant) in federal court, alleging that the federal law preempted the state law. Maine argued, among other things, that a public-health exception to the preemption should apply. The district court ruled that that federal law preempted the Maine law. The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

