Rodriguez v. Lasting Hope Recovery Center of Catholic Health Initiatives
Nebraska Supreme Court
955 N.W.2d 707 (2012)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Mikael Loyd suffered from mental illness. In 2013, he was placed in Lasting Hope Recovery Center of Catholic Health Initiatives (Lasting Hope) (defendant), where he was treated by psychiatrist Jeana Benton (defendant). Benton initially identified Loyd as posing a risk of harm to others. By the time Loyd was discharged five days later, Benton concluded that Loyd’s risk to others had dissipated. While Loyd was in Lasting Hope, his girlfriend, Melissa Rodriguez, told him that she wanted to end their relationship. Although Loyd at no time conveyed to Benton that he had any desire or intent to harm Rodriguez, he strangled and killed Rodriguez on the night of his discharge. Rodriguez’s parents (plaintiffs), as administrators of Rodriguez’s estate, filed a wrongful-death action against Lasting Hope and Benton, alleging that they had breached a duty to warn Rodriguez of the danger posed by Loyd and a duty to take reasonable measures to protect her from that danger. The trial court granted summary judgment in Lasting Hope and Benton’s favor, reasoning that Lasting Hope and Benton could not be liable because Loyd never expressly conveyed to Benton any desire or intent to harm Rodriguez. Rodriguez’s parents appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Heavican, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 903,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

