Roberts v. Melendez
New York City Civil Court
6 Misc. 3d 1015, 2005 WL 192353 (2005)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Courtney Roberts (plaintiff) purchased an 11-week-old male dachshund puppy from Le Petit Puppy (defendant) for $1,200. The parties’ written sales contract included a 14-day health warranty, providing a money-back guarantee if a licensed veterinarian diagnosed the pet as unhealthy, subject to the buyer presenting a statement from a veterinarian detailing the medical condition and permitting the seller to reexamine the pet. The agreement also contained a one-year replacement warranty for congenital defects. Roberts flew the puppy to California the day after purchase and had it examined by her veterinarian. The veterinarian initially found the dog to be normal but noted sneezing, a missing testicle, and the presence of fleas. The veterinarian administered the DHPP vaccine and directed the use of Advantage, an antiflea medication. The following day, the puppy became ill and was hospitalized. It tested positive for parvovirus, though the result may have been affected by the vaccine administered the day before. The puppy was ultimately euthanized. Roberts did not notify Le Petit Puppy of the illness until after the dog’s death, and she never returned the animal or made it available for reexamination. Roberts filed a small-claims action seeking reimbursement for the dog’s purchase price, veterinary bills, and travel expenses.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rakower, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

