Revenue Ruling 95-58

1995-2 C.B. 191 (1995)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Revenue Ruling 95-58

Internal Revenue Service
1995-2 C.B. 191 (1995)

Facts

In 1977, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Revenue Ruling 77-182. It addressed situations in which a decedent, during life, created a trust with a corporate trustee and reserved the right to appoint a successor corporate trustee if the original resigned or was removed by judicial process. The ruling held that the trust’s assets would not be included in the decedent’s gross estate upon death because the decedent had not reserved sufficient discretionary control over the assets. In 1979, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 79-353. It addressed situations in which a decedent created a trust during life and reserved the unrestricted power to remove the trust’s corporate trustee and appoint a successor corporate trustee. The ruling held that in that situation, the decedent reserved sufficient discretionary control for the trust’s assets to be included in the decedent’s gross estate upon the decedent’s death. In 1995, the IRS reconsidered the 1977 and 1979 rulings after a judicial decision raised questions about their ongoing validity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership