Pianka v. The Queen

[1979] A.C. 107 (1979)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pianka v. The Queen

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
[1979] A.C. 107 (1979)

Facts

Jamaica’s territorial sea, meaning the waters over which it exercised sovereignty, extended 12 miles from its coastline. The Star Baby, a small boat registered in the United States, was 3.8 miles from the Jamaica coastline when it was intercepted by the Jamaican coastguard. The boat, which had previously been anchored in a Jamaican harbor, aroused suspicion because it was traveling without lights at night. On the boat, the coastguard found United States citizens Bernard Pianka and Terry Hylton (defendants) with over 3,000 pounds of ganja, a cannabis equivalent. A Jamaican magistrate convicted Pianka and Hylton of possessing and transporting a dangerous drug in violation of Jamaican law. After the Jamaican appellate court affirmed the convictions, Pianka and Hylton appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in England, which continued to serve as the court of last resort for Jamaican cases even after Jamaica gained its independence from Britain. The Privy Council considered whether the Jamaican magistrate had jurisdiction to try the charges against Pianka and Hylton and, if so, whether the Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone provided a defense to liability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilberforce, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership