People v. Joseph Michael Wilkinson

163 Cal. App. 4th 1554 (2008)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Joseph Michael Wilkinson

California Court of Appeal
163 Cal. App. 4th 1554 (2008)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Joseph Wilkinson (defendant) shared an apartment with Jessica Schultze. Schultze’s boyfriend, Harry Sadler, found a video on Schultze’s computer that showed Sadler in Schultze’s room. Sadler discovered that the webcam attached to Schultze’s computer had been moved to point at the bed and video files had been deleted from the computer. Sadler and Schultze complained to the police that Wilkinson was using the webcam to record them. Sadler told police officer James Walker he intended to look for evidence in Wilkinson’s room. Walker said Sadler could pick up anything lying around in the apartment. Sadler took 15 to 20 CDs from Wilkinson’s room. Nothing indicated the CDs’ contents. Sadler viewed some of the CDs, found images of Schultze and Sadler, took all the CDs he could find in Wilkinson’s room, and viewed five to seven more CDs containing images of himself and Schultze naked or engaged in sexual activity. Sadler showed Walker images on two CDs. Walker said he needed to see more explicit images. Sadler reviewed seven to 10 more CDs and showed Walker three or four. Walker seized 36 CDs Sadler removed from Wilkinson’s room. Another officer viewed images on several CDs, but no evidence indicated whether they were limited to those Sadler had viewed. Wilkinson pled no contest to a burglary charge after his motion to suppress was denied. On appeal, Wilkinson argued that the CDs were closed containers, the contents of which were not in plain view, and the police impermissibly expanded the scope of Sadler’s private search by viewing images Sadler had not previously viewed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Robie, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership