National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
United States Supreme Court
432 U.S. 43 (1977)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The National Socialist Party of America (NSPA) (defendant) applied for a permit to demonstrate in the Village of Skokie, Illinois (plaintiff). Skokie was a suburb of Chicago with a majority-Jewish population. The NSPA generally demonstrated in a National Socialist uniform and displayed the swastika during demonstrations. The NSPA chose Skokie as a demonstration site after Chicago imposed a requirement for the NSPA to obtain $250,000 in liability insurance before being issued a permit for demonstration. The Skokie Park District required the NSPA to obtain $350,000 in liability insurance before being issued a permit. The NSPA then sought to congregate at Skokie Village Hall to denounce the denial of the application for the demonstration permit. Skokie granted the permit for the march on Village Hall. However, Skokie learned of plans for large counterdemonstrations in the community. Skokie then filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction preventing the NSPA from demonstrating. The trial court granted the injunction, prohibiting the NSPA from marching in the National Socialist uniform, from displaying the swastika, and from inciting or promoting hatred against persons of the Jewish faith or of any other faith. The NSPA applied for a stay of the injunction pending appeal. The request for the stay was denied by the Illinois Appellate Court and by the Illinois Supreme Court. The Illinois Supreme Court also denied leave for an expedited appeal. The NSPA petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


