Mediacom Communications Corp. v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.

460 F. Supp. 2d 1012 (2006)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mediacom Communications Corp. v. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
460 F. Supp. 2d 1012 (2006)

Facts

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (Sinclair) (defendant) owned television stations. Mediacom Communications Corporation (Mediacom) (plaintiff) owned cable-television systems. Starting in 2002, Mediacom carried 22 Sinclair stations under a retransmission agreement that automatically renewed monthly unless a party terminated with 45 days’ notice. In 2005 Sinclair realized that satellite companies would pay more for retransmission rights for all 22 of its stations. Sinclair attempted to negotiate with Mediacom for more compensation, but Mediacom refused, only willing to pay for 13 of Sinclair’s stations (the tying stations) and not the remaining nine stations (the tied stations). Sinclair and Mediacom could not agree, Sinclair entered into a retransmission agreement with a satellite company, and Sinclair gave Mediacom notice terminating the 2002 retransmission agreement. Mediacom filed suit against Sinclair, alleging violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act and other claims relating to Sinclair’s tying stations. Mediacom sought a preliminary injunction enjoining Sinclair from terminating the 2002 retransmission agreement and engaging in related marketing. Mediacom alleged that its customers would lose trust in Mediacom and enter into long-term contracts with satellite providers. Mediacom also alleged that Sinclair’s marketing campaign would decrease advertising revenues and that customers would complain to government officials. Government officials had written Mediacom sympathetic letters blaming Sinclair. Finally, Mediacom alleged that its customers would pay higher prices and would not have their preferred channels.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pratt, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership