Klein v. Robert's American Gourmet Food

28 A.D.3d 63, 808 N.Y.S.2d 766 (2006)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Klein v. Robert’s American Gourmet Food

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
28 A.D.3d 63, 808 N.Y.S.2d 766 (2006)

Facts

Robert’s American Gourmet Food (Robert) (defendant) distributed snack-food products. Keystone Food Products (Keystone) (defendant) manufactured the relevant snacks. Klein and other purchasers of Robert’s products (collectively, plaintiffs) (collectively, Klein) brought a putative class-action suit against Robert and Keystone in the New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, alleging that the actual fat and caloric content of the relevant snacks substantially exceeded the advertised amounts. Klein, Robert, and Keystone reached a proposed settlement pursuant to which, among other things, Robert would issue $3.5 million in discount coupons for the purchase of Robert’s products, which would be distributed to the general public. There was no indication that the coupons would have any intrinsic cash value or be assignable or transferrable. In exchange, any class members who did not opt out of the settlement generally would be prohibited from suing Robert or Keystone on any theory of recovery that was asserted in the class-action suit. One class member (plaintiff) (objector) who had filed an individual suit in the New York Supreme Court, New York County, asserting essentially the same claims against Robert and Keystone objected to the proposed settlement. The Nassau County court, among other things, certified a settlement-only class consisting of all people in the United States that purchased a relevant snack product during a specified period, approved the settlement, enjoined class members from suing Robert or Keystone for any cause of action released by the settlement, and awarded $790,000 in attorney’s fees to class counsel. The objector appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership