King v. McHugh
Montana First Judicial District Court
2009 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 469 (2009)

- Written by Douglas Halasz, JD
Facts
Ed McHugh (defendant) was the majority owner of McHugh Mobile Home Park Partnership, LLC (the partnership), which refurbished mobile homes for lease or resale. McHugh and his wife subsequently formed Cloverleaf Systems, Inc. (the corporation). The corporation had no other officers or employees, and McHugh was its sole shareholder. The corporation did not hold annual meetings, maintain a separate checking account from the partnership, keep tax and business records, or file corporate tax returns. McHugh used the corporation only once to purchase a mobile home (the subject mobile home). In 2003, the secretary of state dissolved the corporation for failure to file its annual report. Thereafter, McHugh, through the corporation, sold the subject mobile home to the Kings (plaintiffs). The Kings wrote two checks for the purchase, one to McHugh and one to the corporation. Considering the corporation had no assets, the Kings later sued McHugh for alleged misrepresentations regarding the condition of the subject mobile home. The Kings moved for partial summary judgment as to whether the court would pierce the corporate veil and disregard the corporation to hold McHugh personally liable. In response, McHugh contended that the corporation was not used deceivingly to perpetuate a wrong or fraud.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCarter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

