Kemp v. Division No. 241, Amalgamated Association of Street & Electric Railway Employees of America

255 Ill. 213, 99 N.E. 389 (1912)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kemp v. Division No. 241, Amalgamated Association of Street & Electric Railway Employees of America

Illinois Supreme Court
255 Ill. 213, 99 N.E. 389 (1912)

Facts

Harry Kemp (plaintiff) was an employee of the Chicago Railways Company and a member of Division No. 241 of the Amalgamated Association of Street & Electric Railway Employees of America (the union) (defendant), a union of Chicago Railways Company employees. Kemp was part of a group of union members who objected to the union using dues for political purposes. Kemp and the other objecting members (the dissidents) resigned from the union. The union demanded that the dissidents be fired and threatened to strike, and the other union members voted to refuse to work with the dissidents. The dissidents filed suit seeking an injunction against the union that would prevent the union from seeking their discharge. The trial court dismissed the injunction, finding in the union’s favor. The intermediate appellate court reversed, and the union appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cooke, J.)

Concurrence (Carter, J.)

Dissent (Dunn, C.J., Cartwright, Hand, J.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership