Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
K

Kamel v. Kamel

721 S.W.2d 450 (1986)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kamel v. Kamel

Texas Court of Appeals
721 S.W.2d 450 (1986)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Jeffrey Kamel (defendant) and Barbara Kamel (plaintiff) were married and subsequently divorced. Jeffrey was employed by the Cotton Belt Railroad, and his employer provided him with a pension and retirement plan. Railroad retirement benefits were governed by the Railroad Retirement Act. After the Kamels’ divorce, Barbara sued to have the court distribute the Kamels’ community property. Although the Railroad Retirement Act at the time held that certain portions of retirement benefits could be distributed as community property, the Kamels did not submit evidence showing which portions of the retirement benefits were subject to a community-property division. The trial court awarded Barbara a share of Donald’s retirement benefits. Donald appealed, arguing that the Railroad Retirement Act preempted state-law community-property rules and prohibited the distribution of his retirement benefits.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bass, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Family Law

Key Terms