Kaiser Hawaii Kai Development Co. v. City and County of Honolulu

777 P.2d 244 (1989)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kaiser Hawaii Kai Development Co. v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court
777 P.2d 244 (1989)

Facts

Kaiser Hawaii Kai Development Company (Kaiser) (plaintiff) wanted to develop a residential-housing project on a tract of land in the city and county of Honolulu (the city) (defendant). The tract was zoned for residential use. A group of Honolulu citizens opposed the housing project and attempted to place an initiative petition on the ballot. The initiative petition proposed changing the zoning designation of the tract from residential to preservation. This required amending the city’s comprehensive plan, which established the city’s system of land-use regulation. Kaiser brought suit, seeking to enjoin the placement of the initiative petition on the ballot. The circuit court granted the injunction. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wakatsuki, J.)

Dissent (Nakamura, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership