Kadamovas v. Stevens

706 F.3d 843 (2013)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kadamovas v. Stevens

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
706 F.3d 843 (2013)

Facts

Jurijus Kadamovas (plaintiff), a federal inmate, filed a Bivens action against several prison-staff members (defendants), complaining of various mistreatments. Specifically, Kadamovas’s complaint alleged that in retaliation for his hunger strikes, the prison staff used excessive force to force-feed him and draw blood samples, placed him in a cell infested with feces, denied him minimal recreation opportunities, refused to provide him with a Bible, refused to allow him to file grievances, and tried to block his access to the federal courts. Kadamovas’s complaint was 28 pages long and accompanied by a 71-page appendix. English was not Kadamovas’s first language, and he received assistance from another inmate in writing the complaint. The district court dismissed Kadamovas’s complaint before an answer or other responsive pleading was filed, stating that the “99-page complaint” defied understanding, was unintelligible, and failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2)’s requirement for a “short and plain statement” of the claim. Kadamovas appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership