Jacoby v. PREA Coordinator

2017 WL 2962858 (2017)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jacoby v. PREA Coordinator

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
2017 WL 2962858 (2017)

Facts

Brent Jacoby (plaintiff) was incarcerated in an Alabama prison. Jacoby told prison officials that another prisoner had threatened to sexually assault him. The officials promised to move Jacoby to a less violent dorm. However, Jacoby remained in the original dorm, where he was extorted, bought and sold by other prisoners, and forced to perform sexual acts. Jacoby informed officials about the assaults. The information was reported to Angela Gordy (defendant), the prison’s Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) compliance manager. Gordy told Jacoby the prison could not offer him protective custody because he had not been assaulted that specific day. Gordy assured Jacoby that he would be moved soon, but this did not happen. Jacoby was then sold to a pair of prisoners. One of the pair, Willie Jenkins, had a severe drug problem. Jenkins forced Jacoby to take drugs and perform sexual acts. One day, Jenkins discovered Jacoby had smoked one of his joints. Jenkins locked Jacoby in a cell, beat him, and violently sexually assaulted him. Jacoby did not escape the cell until the next day, when a code was called due to a fight between Jenkins and the other prisoner who claimed ownership of Jacoby. Jacoby ran to the shift office to seek medical attention. Prison officials Terry Loggins, Mary Surrett, Arnaldo Mercado, and an unidentified PREA coordinator (the postassault officials) (defendants) were notified of the rape. Officers would not remove Jacoby’s handcuffs to permit a proper rape exam, and no exam was ever performed. Neither Gordy nor the postassault officials attempted to gather other evidence, such as sheets or witness testimony. In addition, no disciplinary action was taken against Jenkins or any of the other prisoners who had previously assaulted Jacoby. Jacoby was placed in protective custody in lockup. Jacoby sued Gordy and the postassault officials in federal district court, alleging that they had (1) failed to protect him in violation of the Eighth Amendment and (2) violated his constitutional rights and PREA by failing to properly investigate or prosecute Jenkins or any of the other abusers. Gordy and the postassault officials moved to dismiss Jacoby’s claims. A magistrate judge considered the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Putnam, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership