International Criminal Court Pre-Trial Chambers Decision on the Court's Territorial Jurisdiction in Palestine

No. ICC-1/18 (Feb 5, 2021)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

International Criminal Court Pre-Trial Chambers Decision on the Court’s Territorial Jurisdiction in Palestine

International Criminal Court
No. ICC-1/18 (Feb 5, 2021)

Facts

The Rome Statute, a multilateral treaty deposited with the United Nations (UN), created the separate International Criminal Court (ICC) and gave the ICC jurisdiction over certain types of crimes if the crime occurred in the territory of a state that had joined the Rome Statute. The Rome Statute stated that it was open for “all States” to join. In 2009, the Palestinian National Authority (Palestine) (plaintiff) submitted a request to the UN to join the Rome Statute treaty. Palestine was not an official member state of the UN, and its international status as a sovereign state was a contentious matter. In 2012, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution giving Palestine “non-member observer State status” in the UN. The resolution specifically did not claim to determine whether Palestine was a state generally and expressly limited the status to Palestine’s status within the UN. However, the resolution also affirmed that the Palestinian people had a sovereign right to “the occupied Palestinian territory,” which was disputed territory over which Palestine and Israel (defendant) both claimed legal rights. As a nonmember observer state, Palestine declared that it was joining the Rome Statute treaty, and the UN’s secretary-general accepted the joinder. In 2018, Palestine used the Rome Statute’s processes to refer crimes to the ICC for prosecution. Palestine alleged that Israel had committed these crimes against Palestinians in “the occupied Palestinian territory” since 2014. Israel was not a member of the Rome Statute. Palestine’s crime referral was assigned to the ICC’s pretrial chambers to determine whether the ICC had jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute the criminal allegations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

Concurrence/Dissent (Kovàcs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership