In re Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
815 F.3d 816, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1245 (2016)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Ray and Amanda Smith sought to patent a variation on the game of blackjack. The game called for the shuffling and dealing of conventional playing cards but changed the standard rules. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) examiner rejected the application on the ground that the claimed subject matter was not eligible for a patent. The PTO board of appeals affirmed. The Smiths appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, arguing that the use of physical cards removed the idea from pure abstraction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stoll, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

