Hopi Tribe v. United States

782 F.3d 662 (2015)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hopi Tribe v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
782 F.3d 662 (2015)

Facts

President Arthur established a reservation for the Hopi Tribe (Hopi) (plaintiff) by executive order in 1882. The order stated that land would be set aside for the Hopi to settle on. Congress ratified the executive order by the Act of July 22, 1958 (Act of 1958), which stated that the lands identified in the order were held by the United States in trust for the Hopi. In the 2000s, the Hopi claimed that the public water systems serving the Hopi Reservation contained unsafe levels of arsenic. The Hopi believed that pursuant to the executive order and the Act of 1958, as well as certain other federal statutes, the United States had a fiduciary duty to ensure adequate water quality on the reservation. Consequently, the Hopi sued the United States in the Court of Federal Claims, seeking damages to cover the cost of improving the water systems to provide safe water. The court found that the Hopi had failed to prove that the United States had assumed a duty to provide safe water. It therefore dismissed the suit. The Hopi appealed to the Federal Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership