H.G. Silverman Litigation Group, P.C., et al. v. TD Bank, N.A., et al.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2022 622 F. Supp. 3d 15 (2022)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
H.G. Silverman Litigation Group, P.C. (H.G.) (plaintiff) employed Molly Moore to handle certain financial transactions, including depositing the firm’s revenues into its account and using the firm’s funds to pay vendors. Between February 2018 and March 2020, Moore embezzled $130,725.39 by issuing more than 175 fraudulent checks payable to “Bounds Contracting” and “M.L. Bounds” and remotely depositing them into her personal checking account at TD Bank, N.A. (TD) (defendant). Moore’s account was registered exclusively under the name “Molly Moore.” After discovering the scheme, H.G. brought suit against TD, alleging that TD was liable for its losses under Pennsylvania Commercial Code § 3404(b) because TD failed to exercise ordinary care by allowing Moore to deposit checks that were not payable to her. Specifically, H.G. alleged that (1) TD’s procedures were not reasonably consistent with general banking usage because another bank, Capital One, refused to accept remote deposits of checks not payable to the account holder and (2) TD violated its own procedures because Moore’s mobile-deposit addendum to her online-banking agreement prohibited her from depositing checks payable to anyone but herself. TD moved to dismiss, arguing, among other things, that H.G. failed to state a claim under § 3404.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gallagher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

