Ex Parte Stem
Alabama Supreme Court
571 So. 2d 1112 (1990)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
William Stem (plaintiff) needed a car to transport his child. Stem bought a used BMW from Gary Braden (defendant), who said he thought the car was in good condition. Within two weeks, Stem learned that the car was composed of the front of one wrecked BMW welded to the rear of an earlier model, that neither the oil sensor nor the speedometer worked, and that the mileage was higher than what he had been led to believe. Stem promptly informed Braden that he would rescind the sale. However, Stem went on driving the vehicle. Stem filed suit against Braden seven months later, by which time he had added 9,000 miles to the car’s mileage. The trial court ordered Braden to repay Stem’s purchase price, with interest. Braden appealed, and the intermediate appellate court reversed on the grounds that Stem accepted the car by continuing to drive it. Stem appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

