Department of Public Welfare v. Haas

15 Ill. 2d 204 (1958)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Department of Public Welfare v. Haas

Illinois Supreme Court
15 Ill. 2d 204 (1958)

Facts

Richard Haas was adjudicated to be mentally incompetent by the state of Illinois and committed to the Lincoln State School. Richard’s father, Edward Haas (Haas) (defendant) was required to pay $60 per month to the state for maintenance charges for Richard’s care at the institution. Haas failed to pay these charges for a number of months, and the Department of Public Welfare for the state of Illinois (the state) (plaintiff) sued Haas in county court to enforce payment of the outstanding charges. The court granted summary judgment to the state and entered judgment against Haas. Haas appealed, arguing that Richard’s maintenance at the facility should be provided by the state because Richard was entitled to a common school education under state law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership