Bennett Paper Corporation v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
78 T.C. 458, aff’d 699 F.2d 450 (8th Cir. 1983)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Bennett Paper Corporation (Bennett) (plaintiff) manufactured corrugated boxes and various paper packaging products. In August 1974, Bennett formed a wholly owned subsidiary called the Commodores International Yacht Club, Inc. (CIYC) to establish a marina and yacht club. In the fall of 1974, CIYC began leasing unimproved waterfront land on which it planned to develop and operate a marina and yacht club. CIYC soon realized, however, that it would be more cost-effective to purchase an existing marina facility. By the end of December 1974, CIYC had not yet acquired a marina or marina facility; it recorded no gross receipts; it had no yacht club members, facilities, boats, or other necessary equipment; it owned no depreciable property; and it had no reciprocal membership privileges with other marinas or yacht clubs. In March 1975, CIYC finally purchased an existing marina and began operations. On its 1974 federal tax return, Bennett claimed a $57,870 deduction for business expenses incurred by CIYC during that year. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) disallowed the deduction, arguing that because CIYC was not carrying on a trade or business at the time the expenses were incurred, they were nondeductible preopening expenses, which must be capitalized. Bennett petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiles, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

