Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
A

Averett v. Shircliff

218 Va. 202 (1977)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Averett v. Shircliff

Virginia Supreme Court
218 Va. 202 (1977)

JL

Facts

Henry Averett (defendant) crashed his vehicle into a car owned by James Shircliff (plaintiff). Shircliff sued Averett, alleging negligence and seeking damages. The trial judge instructed the jury that if Averett was negligent, damages should be awarded based on the difference in market value before and after the crash, unless the car could be repaired. If the car could be restored to its previous condition, then damages should be based on the cost of the repairs and any depreciation in value. The jury awarded Shircliff $4,000 as damages for the car. Shircliff moved the trial court to set aside the verdict and award him approximately $8,000 as the difference in market value before and after the crash. Shircliff argued that, under the Restatement of the Law of Torts, he should be able to elect the difference in market value as his measure of damages. The trial court agreed and granted the motion. Averett appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (I’Anson, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Remedies

Key Terms